Sunday, March 24, 2013

Minimum Age for Sports


With the talk of the new defensive player from South Carolina superstar leaving early to go to the NFL, the minimum age discussion is being talked about again. With the NFL and NBA, they have instituted a minimum age requirement to be employed by the teams of the leagues. In the NFL, a court-sanctioned standard makes any player who is not yet three full seasons removed from high school graduation ineligible for the league’s draft. It used to be four years ­— until 1990.The NBA requires draftees to be at least 19 years old and a year removed from their high school class graduation, as of 2005. Prospects can, however, enter the D-League for nominal pay straight out of high school, or go play in Europe. The NBA used to make players wait four years after high school graduation to compete — until a U.S. Supreme Court decision junked that requirement in 1971. High school prospects were allowed in until the 2005 rule change.
Major League Baseball’s rules allow players to be drafted straight out of high school, unless they attend college. In that case, they must remain through their junior years or until they turn 21. Junior college players, though, can enter the draft whenever they want.
The pro leagues spin those requirements as a means for better facilitating the needs of prospective players. Which is to say, to protect the players from themselves and the temptation to turn pro too early.
The suspicion here is that the rules are meant more to protect professional teams from themselves, and, in some cases, to preserve a no-cost minor league system that has served pro leagues well through the years. In other words, the minimum age requirements might benefit the organizations on both ends of the equation — especially the NCAA and the NBA or the NFL — but they do not fully benefit players who would otherwise be drafted — and paid large sums of money — to do what they are presently doing for little compensation in college.
College football and the NFL, in particular, are the winners here. Not the individual players. CFB gets talent for the cost of tuition for a minimum of three seasons — and the big-time cash that major college football generates for its members — and the NFL gets free training for its future players, as well as extended time to evaluate that talent. The players get their freedom of choice taken away. They play in an ivy-covered academic setting, even if they have no real interest in attending college, effectively majoring in football. That’s a breeding ground for hypocrisy, all in the name of amateurism. Some claim it’s in the best interests of the young players, keeping them shielded from the rigors of pro ball, helping them stay healthy. But they’re just as likely to get hurt playing in college at 20 as they are playing in the NFL at 21.
In the end the player now has the responsibility of shielding himself from injury while the collegiate teams benefit from the star. 
Let's take for instance the new Heisman trophy winner, Johnny Manziel. Johnny Manziel is the first freshman to win the prestigious award. Now every other winner had the opportunity to move on to NFL and receive the endorsements that are associated from the award. In this case, the proceeds will be placed in a fund for the player until after he leaves college. The family of the player cannot receive any proceeds or benefit from the award but the college can benefit from this. The team can recruit using that future players can play with the Heisman trophy winner. Students can be on campus for the next 2 guaranteed years with a Heisman trophy winner. 
Jadeveon Clowney took an out an insurance policy for 5 million dollars to protect himself just in case he is injured. This is an incredible step for collegiate players. The NCAA has offered this policy for many years but this still does not cover the earnings that a player of this stature can earn if he is injured during college. 
I can see why people are furious over the minimum age requirement because it limits the player's potential earnings. The player can get hurt during the time of non-eligibility and also the player's talent is restricted by playing against players that do not measure up to the talent of the superstar. 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/03/07/jadeveon-clowney-takes-out-insurance-policy-ncaa/1972159/



Sunday, March 10, 2013

Kaepernicking


San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick filed to trademark “Kaepernicking,” his bicep-kissing move that’s become ubiquitous. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website shows a registration filed January 14, 2013. Mr. Kaepernick intends to use it on T-shirts, and some proceeds from the Sportiqe “Kaepernicking” shirt go to Camp Taylor, which organizes camps for children with congenital heart defects.
His Kaepernicking trademark may turn out to be quite valuable. After all, Kaepernick’s jersey has been the best-selling NFL jersey on Fanatics.com of late. He was exemplary in the Green Bay playoff game, rushing a record 181 yards with two touchdowns, and passing for 263 yards with two more. Kaepernick’s marketing agent, Shawn Smith of X-A-M Sports, said her team intends to file other trademarks on his behalf.

Colin Kaepernick is not the first person to kiss his bicep in this manner but he is the first to trademark. I think that Kaepernick would be foolish not to get this trademark. Many recent athletes such as Tim Tebow and Robert Griffin III have been posted in many different sites and social networks by others using their touchdown or success pose. I believe that if the wrong people used the pose in a manner that was not becoming of the player than the image would lose its value. With Colin now having this trademark, if it is used in a manner that does not represent him, he can handle it legally.